It would easier singing with whales

Comments

14 responses to “It would easier singing with whales”

1. 

   innerredneckexposed

   March 31, 2009

   Don’t judge JerryT. Don’t judge…

2. 

   JerryT

   March 31, 2009

   Who the hell kisses a hooker?

3. 

   innerredneckexposed

   March 31, 2009

   I wonder…if he told the lady of the night “you’re gonna love my nuts” and when he had his mugshot “camera guy you following me on this?”

4. 

   Jules

   March 31, 2009

   That Shamwow dude is one angry sick assclown.

5. 

   innerredneckexposed

   March 31, 2009

   BTW Yall heard what happened to the Shamwow dude? It is worth an open thread.

6. 

   Zaid

   March 30, 2009

   Am I the only one who thinks “sleeping with the fishes” for some reason when he reads the title? It must be some kind of subconscious association…

7. 

   innerredneckexposed

   March 30, 2009

   Here’s the thing. Nobody will stop Roy in a primary. Sorry David. It’s just not happening. He wants to team up with ONE PERSON, you do it. He’s got the polling to show he can win AND he’s damn good candidate and he’ll raise you money making your life easier. Roy runs because his soul needs that soapbox and he has unfinished business. He’ll do what it takes to win and undoubtedly a slate does.

   That’s a dangerous combination for his foes and IF roy runs, I will literally consume a hat if he doesn’t have some semblance of a slate.

8. 

   JerryT

   March 30, 2009

   Yeah, there ain’t nobody with the backroom dealin’ chops right now. I mean, who’s gonna do it? Dubose? Jane? Calvin?

   I would think Roy could but somehow I think he won’t.

9. 

   Jules

   March 30, 2009

   LOL, and since when have our cats ever marched in parade formation?

   I don’t think this is more than a nice way to keep the clown cars from forming, but I will be shocked if this gets beyond rumorville.

10. 

    TBS

    March 30, 2009

    collard, you’re hearing the same rumors I’m hearing about a possible Barnes “slate” where he will announce not only his candidacy, but an entire team up and down the ticket.

    If that comes to pass, I also see:

    Barnes = Gov

    Thurmond = Lt. Gov

    Baker = A.G.

    Coleman = Ag Sec

    ??? = SOS, Labor, Ins Comm., Ed.

    I know Mary Squires is running for Ins Comm after first sorta-announcing for SOS.

    For 2010, I think the Dems best shot is to have whatever backroom deals need to be made to have a solid slate without a clown car primary a la SOS 2006. The “slate” needs to start raising money ASAP to stand a chance.

    I think that folks like Stuckey-Benfield and Teilhet are better served by staying in the House. It’s too soon to kick around their careers, and they are promising enough that if they get into Dem Caucus leadership, they could led us out of the wilderness. But that’s me taking a long view.

11. 

    collardgreen

    March 30, 2009

    Barnes will run for GOV.

    Thurmond for LT Gov.

    Baker will stay.

    Coleman will run for Ag, but it will be dicey becuase of the peanut thing.

    Insurance, Labor and Secretary of State will be interesting and important. Time for some new blood! Stephanie Benfield? Rob Teilhet?

    With all the movement, we could easily lose some, and we might can win some. If Barnes does get in, it will be because the polling says he can win.

12. 

    innerredneckexposed

    March 29, 2009

    Nah, Tommy ain’t running for re-election.

    Terry Coleman is running though. Or will run.

    Where the hell Thurber gonna go? Dude don’t do nothing as AG and he likes being a politico, but I don’t think he likes doing too much work.

13. 

    Jules

    March 29, 2009

    Don’t be so sure about Thurbert and Tommy’s wounded after the peanut and castleberry food fiasco’s.

14. 

    innerredneckexposed

    March 29, 2009

    Well we have three officers, Ag is staying here, there is a reason Tommy made Terry his deputy and is taking him all over the state.

    Thurbert’s going nowhere.

    Thurmond’s going nowhere.

    Sounds like 3 takeaway 0.