House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has always been an easy target for her critics in the GOP, particularly Republicans in Georgia. There have been some election years, in fact, when I would have sworn that Pelosi was listed on the Georgia ballot because I heard her name pop up so much.
The latest Georgia pol to jump on the anti-Nancy bandwagon is
Mike Evans, the former legislator and DOT board chairman who is running
for Nathan Deal’s 9th District congressional seat.
Evans
released a statement recently demanding Pelosi’s resignation as speaker
because of what he called her “grossly irresponsible behavior” in
accusing the CIA of not being truthful about what was said during a
security briefing back in 2002.
“It’s unbelievable that a leader
trusted with so much power would attack the integrity of the
intelligence community for petty political posturing,” Evans said.
“Someone this irresponsible does not deserve to serve in a role that
makes her second in line to the presidency.”
Evans added: “Some
things are more important than politics and our national security is
one of them. I agree with Newt Gingrich when he said Pelosi continuing
as speaker is ‘very dangerous’ for our country and ‘America can’t
afford it.’ If the voters of north Georgia trust me to be their voice
in Congress, I will not sit idly by while radical liberals endanger our
country and our families to cover up their hypocrisy.”
Former
speaker Newt Gingrich is among the many Republican voices that have
been calling for Pelosi’s ouster after she accused the CIA of lying to
Congress about the security briefing.
Gingrich’s argument has
been somewhat undercut, however, by disclosures that Republican leaders
in Congress, including Rep. John Boehner and Rep. Pete Hoekstra, have
made similar accusations of CIA lying in the past. During an intense
interview with Diane Sawyer, Gingrich was asked several times to
explain why Pelosi was wrong when the GOP leaders have also called out
the CIA for the agency’s purported lies. He did not have a convincing
answer.
The criticisms of Pelosi from Evans and Gingrich are the
latest attempts by Georgia Republicans to gain an advantage by invoking
the name of the prototypical “San Francisco Democrat.” But how
successful have these criticisms been when it comes to actually winning
elections?
In 2006, when Rep. Jim Marshall of Macon was
challenged by former Republican congressman Mac Collins, the issue of
Marshall’s upcoming vote on the election of Pelosi as House speaker was
raised countless times in debates and on the campaign trail.
Marshall
was body-slammed about his alleged ties to Pelosi again in 2008 when he
was opposed by retired Air Force general Rick Goddard.
Marshall
survived the attacks and won both of those elections: he edged Collins
by 1,752 votes and trounced Goddard by 39,795 votes.
Marshall’s
middle Georgia district is very conservative but also includes a
sizeable contingent of African American residents. That helps cushion
him against the Pelosi attacks.
The 9th District, where Evans
will be running, is even more Republican-leaning than Marshall’s
district and has a much smaller percentage of black voters – so the
anti-Pelosi statements may have more resonance there. All of the
controversy about her CIA comments appears to have hurt Pelosi’s
numbers in national polls, so maybe Evans will finally get some
political traction by invoking her name.
Leave a Reply