It’s July 1st, Get Off Your Phone

The “texting while driving” law goes into effect today.  No reading, sending or writing any texts, emails or tweets while sitting at a red light or it’s a $150 ticket.

Whether this includes using a Google Maps app on your iPhone is anyone’s guess.  It’s certainly internet data, but is it a communication?  Can’t wait for the appellate decisions on this law.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

17 responses to “It’s July 1st, Get Off Your Phone”

  1. JMPrince Avatar

    You need not have any electronic device to be a very poor and/or distracted driver. Ask any mom, especially ones traveling with more than one kid! Then there’s always this too: (Some harsh Language noted).
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWFG4oEn87E&feature=related

  2. Jen B. Avatar
    Jen B.

    I would advise everyone to file speedy trial demands on these tickets; however, you’re not entitled to a jury trial since there’s no possibility of jail time.

  3. griftdrift Avatar

    Probably not. The logging on devices is “thin”. Although it’s been years since I’ve been in the industry. Who knows what these fancy new toys record.

  4. Sara Avatar
    Sara

    But wouldn’t transactions only count as sending or receiving texts or emails and sending or receiving data over the internet connection or through applications? Viewing or typing activity isn’t recorded, just incoming or outgoing data, right?

    In other words, if I open an email that was previously automatically downloaded to my blackberry (as part of the every 1 minute email push), will my blackberry record when I opened it, that I scrolled down through it, and what time all of that happened? Or the Ubertwitter account…does my blackberry record that I opened the Ubertwitter application and read the previously auto-refreshed twitter feed?

  5. griftdrift Avatar

    Sara is pretty much correct. There are two things a cell phone company could provide which would be relevant

    1. Record of an outbound text (completely damning)
    2. Record of an increase in outgoing data transmission (hardly damning)

    Every smart phone has a bit of “chatter” as it communicates with the nearest tower. From the innocuous ping to you forwarding a 10mg pdf. Subpeoning the phone records for anything other than the texts would be pretty useless.

    However…

    The smartphone itself logs all transactions and with the right technology access, that could be damning. Which leads me to…

    Could an officer confiscate a phone as evidence?

  6. Jen B. Avatar
    Jen B.

    Driving While Distracted is already a law and has been for years in Georgia and people get ticketed for it. The Georgia Legislature is full of wimpass morons.

  7. Jules Avatar
    Jules

    And yet you can still drive around with the phone jammed up into your ear. Most states started
    By forcing everyone to have a headset or bluetooth, then built ujp from there with the distracted while driving laws, we of coursed skipped that and made a ridiculously
    Broad law that no one has respect for. Not surprising.
    I too will be breaking this law….

  8. He Hate Me Avatar
    He Hate Me

    Dude, haven’t you seen The Wire? They’ll just clone your **** and know where you are all the time.

  9. Jen B. Avatar
    Jen B.

    If the cop decides to be a dick and not believe the passenger, then the State has to prove the driver was using the device. And the Defense may have to put up the passenger because the cop may be a bigger dick and say he saw the driver.

  10. Sara Avatar
    Sara

    Yeah, any device that is pulling from email servers on an automated basis is going to show you are accessing data every 1 minute, 5 minutes, whatever. I’m not sure it will show a distinction between when the device is being manually manipulated and when it’s refreshing automatically.

    The cell phone records will really only come in handy for actual texting, which is why it is silly that this law was written so broadly as to encompass all sorts of other things we do while driving.

  11. Sara Avatar
    Sara

    They’ve got to find me to ticket me.

  12. He Hate Me Avatar
    He Hate Me

    Thanks, have now alerted the authorities to your malfeasance.

  13. He Hate Me Avatar
    He Hate Me

    I don’t know how this technology works (or anything else really) but that doesn’t seem like it would be enough. Aren’t Blackberries always retrieving email anyway?

  14. Sara Avatar
    Sara

    What about iPhones that people are using to play music in their cars? I wonder if selecting songs is considered a “communication.”

    P.S. I’m breaking this law every damn day and I don’t care who knows it.

  15. CatherineAtlanta Avatar

    I know it’s convoluted but what if: Say you are a passenger in a car. The driver has entered all the address information in his or her phone so that you, the passenger, can assist the driver. Then by some bum luck you get in an accident. They subpoena the cell phone records that show the driver’s phone was accessing data at the time of the accident. What then?

  16. Jen B. Avatar
    Jen B.

    Hm. If you input the address prior to leaving your legal parking position and the directions are spoken, then I don’t think it’s a violation because the law specifies that you can’t “send, write or read.” Should be interesting!

  17. CatherineAtlanta Avatar

    This morning National NPR did a story about this and reported that using phone map apps and other phone GPS-type stuff was verboten, as well. They also said that phone records could be subpoenaed if an accident occurs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *